You can best develop your historical thinking skills by analyzing an assortment of primary and secondary sources.Being exposed to a variety of diverse views builds your ability to evaluate the effectiveness of different types of arguments.Tags: Sapling Chemistry HomeworkEssay Stories With Moral ValuesStrategic Planning Vs Business PlanningReferences On Research PaperQualities Of A Good School SupervisorNarrative Essay About Honesty Is The Best PolicyColon Case Study ScribdTeamwork Problem Solving GamesThesis About Arthur Miller
These three sections make up 60% of the overall AP World History total exam score. You can see clearly that the College Board wants you to use those historical thinking skills on the exam.
SAQs will address one or more of themes of the course.
You further refine those skills through the regular development of historical argumentation in writing.
The nine historical thinking skills are grouped into four categories: Analyzing Historical Sources and Evidence, Making Historical Connections, Chronological Reasoning, and Creating and Supporting a Historical Argument.
Synthesis – This skill may be the most challenging of all the thinking skills in the AP World History course and can be mastered only after spending some time as a professional historian.
There are ways that you, as an AP student, can show your proficiency in the skill of synthesis.
We will then discuss the five most important of those skills needed to excel on the exam.
We will also arm you with the strategies needed for spotting these skills on the exam, how to use them to analyze a primary source critically, and how you can include them in your own writing.
This includes understanding the types of questions that are asked, as well as considering how the particular circumstances and contexts in which historians work and write shape their interpretations of past events and historical evidence.
Comparison – This skill involves your ability to identify, compare, and evaluate multiple perspectives on a given historical event so you can make conclusions about that event.