Some believe that when it comes to death-penalty cases, this is not a huge cause for concern.
In his concurrent opinion in the 2006 Supreme Court case suggests that the figure could be higher.
In 1978 — two years after the Supreme Court issued its decision reversing a previous ban on the death penalty () — the National Research Council (NRC) published a comprehensive review of the current research on capital punishment to determine whether one of these hypotheses was more empirically supported than the others.
The NRC concluded that “available studies provide no useful evidence on the deterrent effect of capital punishment.” Researchers have subsequently used a number of methods in an effort to get closer to an accurate estimate of the deterrence effect of the death penalty.
Authors Samuel Gross (University of Michigan Law School), Barbara O’Brien (Michigan State University College of Law), Chen Hu (American College of Radiology) and Edward H.
Capital Punishment Research Paper Conclusion Narrative Essays On Life Changing Events
Kennedy (University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine) examine data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics and the Department of Justice relating to exonerations from 1973 to 2004 in an attempt to estimate the rate of false convictions among death row defendants.
One general challenge is that when it comes to capital punishment, a counter-factual policy is simply not observable.
You cannot simultaneously execute and not execute defendants, making it difficult to isolate the impact of the death penalty.
Further, recent polls from the Pew Research Center indicate that only a bare majority of Americans now support capital punishment, 55%, down from 78% in 1996.
Scholarly research sheds light on a number of important aspects of this issue: False convictions One key reason for the contentious debate is the concern that states are executing innocent people.