Whether the NCAA restores multiyear scholarships, or retains one-year awards whose renewal is not conditioned on athletic ability or injury, this landmark legislation would recapture the spirit of amateurism that makes college sport a distinctive entertainment product. Not only would this legislation improve federal graduation, but it would help the NCAA achieve its stated purpose of treating athletes as an integral part of the student body.Research has found that the higher the retention rate, the more socially and academically integrated a student is into a college or university.Tags: College Essay Intellectual ExperienceEnglish Composition EssayAtlas Sound Money EssayWhat Can I Write An Essay AboutPlace Value HomeworkLatest Book Reviews
These organizations are raking in huge profits from merchandise sales, live events of media coverage.
Unlike the professional leagues, though, the athletes don’t get a cut.
Under this system, coaches would no longer be able to cancel scholarships to make room for more talented players, thus increasing the percentage of freshmen likely to graduate from the school that recruited them.
Another proposal gaining support within the NCAA is to pay athletes a stipend that would cover the full cost of attendance at their institutions.
College sports wouldn’t exist without the athletes, and it’s not fair that these hard-working, hard-playing individuals don’t get to benefit from sales attributed directly to them.
The NCAA and other organizations will even put a college player’s name on a jersey, hat or other sportswear and never send a penny to the player.One such proposal is to return to multiyear scholarships.This proposal, which the NCAA’s president, Mark Emmert, says is gaining broad support within the NCAA, would guarantee the yearly renewal of financial aid to athletes who continue playing and adhere to team rules.The FGR for the general student body at the University of Florida in 2010 was 81 percent, compared with only 42 percent for football players.Multiyear scholarships covering the full cost of attendance would narrow the gap between football players and other students.College athletes deserve financial recognition for the merchandise profit they generate, as well as the opportunity to pursue their own financial gains.As athletes, they work hard on the field every day to bring in fans and wins for their school; it’s only fair that they are rewarded for their efforts, at least in some small way.From an academic perspective, the most reasonable way to increase player compensation is to enhance their opportunity to receive the education a scholarship is supposed to provide.As John Thompson, Georgetown’s former men’s basketball coach, has said, “If you get a scholarship, it is extremely important to understand that it has a money value to it.” A few changes in NCAA rules could significantly increase federal graduation rates for athletes, thus raising the dollar value of their scholarships.The realignment of major college football conferences highlights the explosive growth of commercialism in college sports, and universities’ willingness to exploit supposedly amateur athletes to reach new television markets.Most sports fans are aware that universities already pay athletes in the form of room and board, tuition and fees, an investment that can range from ,000 to ,000 a year.