What the novel criticizes the most is the discrepancy between the value of human life and the value of a scientific discovery.
What the novel criticizes the most is the discrepancy between the value of human life and the value of a scientific discovery.Tags: Automotive Service Technician Research PaperEssay On Why SchoolsPurdue Dissertation FormsCreative Writing Exercises For College StudentsKabul Beauty School EssayEssay Typer Not WorkingDoes Essay Land Man Much Need TolstoyEssay On Impact Of It Revolution
The novel highly criticizes the possible outcomes of the uncontrolled scientific progress and is a call of duty of each scientist to think carefully before creating something and to analyze if the world and he himself truly need this creation. The literature work Frankenstein can be considered to be on of the best reflections of the world perception back in the period of the Scientific Revolution.
Thought the novel was written in 1817-its conflict is still vital in the contemporary world.
It was an epistemological transformation that changed everything around people.
These global changes influenced the literature heritage greatly.
Shelly criticizes the thought that science makes the God out of a man.
Viktor Frankenstein brings a life to the world just to satisfy his ambitions, just to prove that he can do it.
His words reveal the nonentity that Mary Shelley sees in him: new species would bless me as its creator and source; many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me.
The question that Mary Shelley worries the most about is how far a scientist should pursue his thirst for knowledge, how far should he lead his experiments and whether they are worth of the possible outcome and damage they can bring.
The Scientific Revolution did not care about this issues, it just went on and on like an avalanche that no one can stop and prevent.
The collision of science and human values in the book emphasizes the meaning of ethics and morality in the life of each scientist.