Another common mistake is to think that your case will be stronger if you mention, even if briefly, virtually every argument that you have come across in support of your position.Sometimes this is called the "fortress approach." In actual fact, it is almost certain that the fortress approach will not result in a very good paper. First, your reader is likely to find it difficult to keep track of so many different arguments, especially if these arguments approach the topic from different directions.If a person doesn't wish to put forth any effort and work hard to support themselves, then that person deserves nothing.Tags: Eye Prothesis Doc FindBlock Style Research PaperTattoo Parlor Business PlanTrue Love Waits EssaysArgumentative Essay Conclusion SentenceVerizon Fios Business PlansCorporate Assignment Of MortgageEssay On Vegetarianism Vs Meat EatingGibbs Reflection Essay
For better or for worse, your paper is all that is available. The responsibility for ensuring the accurate communication of ideas falls on the shoulders. Can he or she read your entire paper through without getting stuck on a single sentence? In general terms, do not be content simply to get your paper out of your hands. Clear writing reflects clear thinking; and that, after all, is what you are really trying to show.
You must say exactly what you mean and in a way that minimizes the chances of being misunderstood. There is no such thing as a piece of good philosophical writing that is unclear, ungrammatical, or unintelligible. A poor writing style militates against both of these.
The first of my three philosophies, to work hard, can be very easily explained.
I feel that if money or a gift given to me by another person because I earned the reward is much more valued.
A rough idea is usually one that is not well worked out, not clearly expressed, and as a result, not likely to be understood.
Whether you actually do it in your paper or not, you should be able to state in a short sentence precisely what you want to prove.Second, the ones that will stand out will be the very best ones and the very worst ones. Only the most compelling one or two arguments should be developed.Including weaker ones only gives the impression that you are unable to tell the difference between the two.More advanced students might do well to read Philosophical Writing: An Introduction, by A. Personal Philosophy on Life I have no single philosophy for life, but rather three philosophies. My three philosophies include the following: work hard, take pride in myself and the accomplishments that I make, and also everyone is on this planet for a reason.Unfortunately, your reader (likely your marker or instructor) has no access to those thoughts except by way of what actually ends up on the page.He or she cannot tell what you meant to say but did not, and cannot read in what you would quickly point out if you were conversing face to face.I offer first some general comments on philosophical writing, and then some specific "do"s and "don't"s.One of the first points to be clear about is that a philosophical essay is quite different from an essay in most other subjects.I have found that if I don't take pride in myself and what I do than I might as well give up on life.My reason for this being that no one else will think highly of me if I, myself, don't.