Each type of material added should be added as a new appendix and each separate appendix should be labelled or numbered, for example, Appendix A or Appendix I.
It is also useful to name the appendix with a descriptive title, for example, 'Appendix A: Raw Data.' Appendices are normally placed at the end of a document before the notes or references, or sometimes at the end of a chapter in a book and always included, with a page reference, in the Table of Contents.
Should I write this MLA history paper in past tense? .” The same is true for your Results and Method sections, but APA makes an exception for Discussion sections (where you examine your conclusions and the implications of the study), which can be in present tense if it better conveys your meaning. Per MLA, you should be almost always using present tense: “In , Atticus Finch argues . .” If you need to differentiate time, you should use present perfect tense: “For many years, Scout has been worrying about . If you switch, make sure you need to, such as: The Romans still in use today.
Should I write my short story in present or past tense? AP: AP, which is used by news media, is also more flexible.
This can apply to anything from lengthy quotations and long lists to detailed procedures and excessive raw data.
The second question to be answered when preparing to write an appendix is this one: Is it more helpful for the reader that this information be included in the main text or placed in a separate section?Plus, get practice tests, quizzes, and personalized coaching to help you succeed.When writing, people are often confused about what tense they should use. .” If you must, you can use some past tense, but keep it to a minimum. Per Chicago, you can use either present or past (Though it’s best to use present when discussing literature and past when writing about history.), but make sure you stay consistent.An appendix is an addition to the main text, but this does not mean that it serves as a repository for essential information that cannot be conveniently placed within the main text.The main text should always be complete in itself and the central argument be supported within the main text, as if the appendix were not there at all.The problem with this bulk of material is where to include it.If it is only loosely related to the topic, adding it to the main text might distract from the central argument and result in an unfocused piece of writing that is structurally messy and cluttered.If it is, then it must be included in the main text.If, however, it is too lengthy or too detailed it might be better to summarise it, including the essential points in the main text, and then writing an appendix to place the complete material in its own dedicated section.Again, it might be best for a reader to have all the essential information in the main text, instead of having to refer to an appendix, which can often be inconvenient and impractical.However, if this means that the main text will be difficult to read because lengthy and detailed material will interfere with the general flow of the argument, then the writer should write an appendix and relegate material to this appendix.