Traditionalists argue that parliament is legislatively able to judge or deal with all matters, without any consultation from any branches of the government, so parliament being the supreme authority is the finest thing in the British Constitution.
Opponents of an uncodified constitution argue that United Kingdom lacks a formal codified document, in other words there is no single document with a special legal status which comprehends of all the principal and rules regarding the goals of the country.
If we refer to the first definition mentioned above, it is clear that UK does not possess a constitution, as British Constitution lacks a single formal constitutional document.
Although, United Kingdom does, however have a constitution, as seen from the second definition as above, clearly stating ‘collection of rules’ governed by the institutions.
Perhaps in a codified constitution, law becomes more definite.
Parliament can pass or repeal any law that it chooses which can sometimes act as an advantage or a disadvantage in the British Constitution.
There is no legal restraint on the legislation, which brings into light the parliamentary sovereignty that exists in the British political system.Many assume that having an uncodified constitution is better than having a codified constitution and visa a versa.There is a large disagreement on whether existing United Kingdom arrangements are desirable, or whether a codified constitution of some kind should be adopted.Change is very difficult or unlikely in a rigid constitution or written constitution.It is difficult to alter any law to keep up with the fluctuations that transpire in society every day.It would also create less misunderstanding about the significance of constitutional rules and also greater certainty then can be enforced.This is the argument for ambiguity which is a weakness of the constitution.The on-going debate about the British Constitution that whether it should be codified or uncodfied has made people perplexed.Currently, United Kingdom has an uncodified constitution; only parts of which are entrenched.Although in this situation government is trying to protect individuals from terror, but it does not justify encroaching unnecessarily on individual rights and freedom.Therefore, if the objective of passing a law is to safeguard individual rights and liberties and the avenue to achieve these objectives are the same that affect individual rights and liberties, then the question that should be asked here is-whether we have chosen the wrong means?
Comments Should Britain Have A Codified Constitution Essay
Should the UK adopt a fully codified constitution? Daniel.
This essay will examine the argument for codification - the centralisation of the. re-emergence in support for a fully codified constitution has picked up where.…
Britain's unwritten constitution - The British Library
However, in Britain we certainly say that we have a constitution, but it is. this 800th anniversary year – should the UK now take steps to codify.…
Should Britain Adopt a Written Constitution? – King's Student.
This essay will firstly introduce some of the proposals that have been. The debate about the codification of the British constitution has gone.…
Whether or not the UK should adopt a codified constitution.
Uncodified constitutions was to take the UK's idea of a constitution and put it. Another fundamental argument that we should have a codified constitution is that.…
Model essay should the uk adopt a codified constitution
Is a good website if you're looking to get your essay written for you. You can also request things like research papers or.…
Should the UK have a codified constitution? - A-Level Politics.
A constitution is a set of rules that establishes how political power should be distributed, the. In the UK, we have an un-codified constitution; this means that it is not written down on one single document. However. Search for your essay title.…
Arguments For and Against the UK Having a Written Constitution
Hence, this essay will show why the UK should not adopt a codified constitution in light of the contemporary challenges. Points that will be.…
Should Britain have a codified constitution? - Advantages and.
Britain would have a two-tier legal system and so constitutional laws. Britain should have a codified constitution because it will ensure the.…
Should the United Kingdom adopt a Written Constitution?
This essay on UK constitutional law has been written in May 2014. the political spectrum have started to call for a codified constitution, and it.…
Why the UK needs a written constitution - uk
A state has a constitution, whether it is written or unwritten. In a written constitution these matters are codified, and means are provided for judicial review of. Intellectual property – why you should choose the UK. a collection of essays published by I. B. Tauris in collaboration with the Foundation for Law.…